Month: October 2025

Uncategorized

How to Red-Team Your AI for Prompt Injection and Data Leakage

Your customer-support bot looked secure — until a user typed a jailbreak. This guide shows how the modern attack surface for LLMs (large language models / LLM) is the final assembled prompt used by RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) systems: Final Prompt = System Prompt + Retrieved Data + User Input. Attackers weaponize user input or retrieved documents to perform prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, and data exfiltration / data leakage. The threats (what red-teams do) Direct prompt injection (jailbreak) — attacker tells the model to “ignore previous instructions” and the model follows because tokens are tokens. Example: user forces the bot to become a comedian and leak info. Indirect prompt injection (Trojan horse via RAG) — malicious instructions are hidden inside uploaded docs (resumes, PDFs). When retrieved as context, the model obeys those instructions, bypassing user-input filters. This is the biggest RAG attack vector. Data exfiltration / The Heist — attacker social-engineers the LLM into dumping sensitive context or the system prompt (confidential internal commands, heuristics, DB schemas). Layered defenses (blue-team playbook) Input & output filtering — regex / keyword scanning for phrases like “ignore” or for leakage of the system prompt (useful but brittle). Robust prompt engineering (instructional fences) — separate instructions from data with strong delimiters (e.g., , , ). This tells the model which text is data vs instructions. Model-level defenses — prefer instruction-tuned models (GPT-4, Claude 3, Llama 3) and classification pipelines (cheap LLM for intent classification, strong LLM for answers). Use separate LLMs for safety checks. Automation for red-teaming — use tools like garak (open-source LLM vulnerability scanner) to run prompt injection probes and find weaknesses automatically. Follow standards — adopt the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs (LLM01: Prompt Injection, LLM02: Sensitive Information Disclosure, LLM08: Vectors & Embeddings, etc.) as part of secure development lifecycle. Takeaway / CTA LLM security is a cat-and-mouse game. To protect against prompt injection, data leakage, and RAG-based Trojans, design defense-in-depth: input/output filters, strong prompt engineering, model-level controls, automated red-teaming (garak), and adherence to the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs. Red-team your models now — find the holes before someone else does.

Read more »

Cart

Your cart is empty.

Start Shopping